Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Acute thoracic aortic dissection: a case report


Introduction: Aortic dissection (AD) is the most common aortic emergency, result in a catastrophic outcome. Patients usually asymptomatic, some of them present with sudden severe, tearing or sharp back or anterior chest pain and haemodynamic disturbance. Early and accurate diagnosis and treatment determine the patient outcome.

Case Report: A case of 40 years old man complained of acute, sharp, chest pain since 4 days before admission which worsen instead of medical treatment, with a history of smoking since a few years ago. A vital sign was within normal limit. Laboratory result showed high CKMB, troponin T, LDH result. Occasional ventricular extrasystoles and inferior ischaemic was found in the ECG examination. From echocardiography, the patient suspected to have aortic dissection Stanford type A since an intimal flap on ascending aorta was found, with left ventricle hypertrophy, dilatation of right atrium and right ventricle, severe aortic regurgitation, moderate mitral regurgitation, severe tricuspid regurgitation, moderate pulmonary regurgitation and moderate pulmonary hypertension. From plain radiography, the patient showed mediastinum widening and cardiomegaly, CT angiography showed Stanford type A aortic dissection (DeBakey type I).  The patient refused to seek further treatment for operation as suggested.

Conclusion: It is still challenging to differentiate aortic dissection (AD) and another acute chest emergency. Since clinical presentation and laboratory result may be similar between those illnesses. Therefore careful history taking and further imaging examination should be considered to increase the patient outcome.


  1. Fattori R, Lovato L. Chapter 24: The Thoracic Aorta: Diagnostic Aspects. In: Adam A, Dixon AK, Gillard JH, Schaefer-Prokop CM, eds. Grainger and Allison’s Diagnostic Radiology Vol I. 6th ed. China, Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, 2015; 553-590.
  2. McMahon MA, Squirell CA. Multidetector CT of AD: A Pictorial Review. RadioGraphics. 2010; 30:445–460 . doi: 10.1148/rg.302095104.
  3. Claussen CD, Miller S, Riessen R, Fenchel M, Kramer U. Chapter 10: AD. In: Direct Diagnosis In Radiology Cardiac Imaging. Stuttgart, Theme; 2008: 259-262.
  4. Hawatmeh A, Arqoub AA, Isbitan A, Fayez S. A case of ascending AD mimicking acute myocardial infarction and complicated with pericardial tamponade. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016;6(2):166-171. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2015.11.06.
  5. Zheng Z, Ye Z, Huang Y, Xu J, Cai R, Zhan H. A case report of acute myocardial infarction concomitant with Standford type B aortic dissection. J Car Dis Res. 2013: 251e253 doi: 10.1016/j.jcdr.2013.12.002.
  6. Cai J, Cao Y, Yang K, Zhul YS. Inferior myocardial infarction secondary to aortic dissection associated with bicuspid aortic valve. Cardiol Res. 2012;3(2):94-96. doi: 10.4103/0975-3583.95370.
  7. Wang JY, Chen H, Song D, Su X Acute Myocardial Infarction Secondary to Aortic Dissection. J Vasc Med Surg. 2016: 255. doi:10.4172/2329-6925.1000255.
  8. D’Aloiaa A, Vizzardia E, Bugattia S, Magatellia M, Bonadeia I, Rovettaa R, et al. A Type A Aortic Dissection Mimicking an Acute Myocardial Infarction. Cardiol Res. 2012;3(2):94-96. doi:10.4021/cr151w.
  9. Martin JFV, Andrade LG, Loureiro AAC, Fernandes M, Braile DM. Myocardial infarction and aortic dissection: an important differential diagnosis. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;19(4):386-390.
  10. Danbauchi SS, Ibinaiye PO, Anhiam CA, Alhassan MA. DeBakey type 1 acute aortic dissection presenting as inferior myocardial infarction: A case report and review of literature. Int Sur. 2013;3(2):12-19. doi: 0.4103/2278-9596.122945.

How to Cite

Dewi, D. A. R., & Putra Ayusta, M. D. (2020). Acute thoracic aortic dissection: a case report. Intisari Sains Medis, 11(2), 769–772.




Search Panel

Dewa Ayu Ratna Dewi
Google Scholar
ISM Journal

Made Dwija Putra Ayusta
Google Scholar
ISM Journal