Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Penilaian mutu asuhan keperawatan sebelum dan sesudah penerapan clinical pathway di Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat (RSUP) Sanglah, Bali, Indonesia

  • I Made Artana ,
  • Putu Ayu Indrayathi ,
  • I Made Ady Wirawan ,


Abstract

Background: Hospitals implement clinical pathways in an effort to improve the quality of health services, especially the quality of nursing care. This study aims to determine whether the quality of nursing care after the application of the clinical pathway is better than the quality of nursing care prior to the clinical pathway application.

Methods: This study used 180 inpatient medical records in January 2017-May 2019 with five priority medical diagnoses namely cerebral concussion and epidural hematoma (conservative therapy), conservative treatment of preterm premature rupture of membranes, ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) , atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT), atrial tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, premature ventricular contractions (PVC), ventricular tachycardia (VT), junctional tachycardia and intracerebral haemorrhage (hemorrhagic stroke) as well as post-Lapastomy frozen section in the selected cystic ovary with a selective curative cyst . The variables studied were the application of clinical pathway, quality of nursing care, quality of assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation and evaluation of nursing. Data were analyzed with the Pearson Chi-Square Test on SPSS version 17 for Windows.

Results: The quality of good nursing care before and after the application of clinical pathway was 15.2% versus 50.9% (p = 0.00); good quality of nursing assessment before and after clinical pathway application of 6.7% versus 64.9% (p = 0.00); good quality of diagnosis before and after clinical pathway application of 72.7% versus 73.7% (p = 0.889); the quality of the nursing plan which consisted of good quality of goal formulation before and after the application of clinical pathway was 75.8% versus 73.7% (p = 0.759); good quality determination of interventions before and after clinical pathway application of 75.8% versus 79.8% (p = 0.523), good quality of implementation before and after clinical pathway application of 100% versus 100% and good quality of nursing evaluation before and after the application of clinical pathway is 100% versus 100%.

Conclusion: The quality of nursing care and nursing assessment after the implementation of clinical pathway is significantly better than before the implementation of clinical pathway, while no significant difference was found in the quality of diagnosis, planning, implementation and evaluation of nursing.

 

Latar Belakang: Rumah sakit menerapkan clinical pathway dalam upaya meningkatkan mutu pelayanan kesehatan khususnya mutu asuhan keperawatan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah mutu asuhan keperawatan sesudah penerapan clinical pathway lebih baik daripada mutu asuhan keperawatan sebelum penerapan clinical pathway

Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan 180 rekam medis pasien rawat inap pada bulan Januari 2017-Mei 2019 dengan lima diagnosis medis prioritas yaitu cerebral concussion dan epidural hematoma (terapi konservatif), penanganan konservatif ketuban pecah dini preterm, ablasi pada  atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT), atrial takikardi, atrial fibrilasi, premature ventricular contractions (PVC), ventricular tachycardia (VT), junctional takikardi dan intracerebral haemorrhage (stroke hemoragik) serta post laparatomi frozen section pada kista ovarii curiga ganasyang dipilih dengan purposive sampling. Variabel yang diteliti adalah penerapan clinical pathway, mutu asuhan keperawatan, mutu pengkajian, penegakan diagnosis, rencana, implementasi dan evaluasi keperawatan. Data dianalisis dengan Uji Pearson Chi-Square pada SPSS versi 17 untuk Windows.

Hasil: Mutu asuhan keperawatan yang baik sebelum dan sesudah penerapan clinical pathway sebesar 15,2% versus 50,9% (p=0,00); mutu pengkajian keperawatan yang baik sebelum dan sesudah penerapan clinical pathway sebesar 6,7% versus 64,9% (p=0,00); mutu penegakan diagnosis yang baik sebelum dan sesudah penerapan clinical pathway sebesar 72,7% versus 73,7% (p=0,889);  mutu rencana keperawatan yang terdiri mutu  perumusan tujuan yang baik sebelum dan sesudah penerapan clinical pathway sebesar 75,8% versus 73,7% (p=0,759); mutu penentuan intervensi yang baik sebelum dan sesudah penerapan clinical pathway sebesar 75,8% versus 79,8% (p=0.523), mutu implementasi yang baik sebelum dan sesudah penerapan clinical pathway sebesar 100% versus 100% dan mutu evaluasi keperawatan yang baik sebelum dan sesudah penerapan clinical pathway sebesar 100% versus 100%.

Simpulan: Mutu asuhan keperawatan dan pengkajian keperawatan sesudah penerapan clinical pathway secara signifikan lebih baik daripada sebelum penerapan clinical pathway, sedangkan mutu penegakan diagnosis, rencana, implementasi dan evaluasi keperawatan tidak terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan.

Keywords: clinical pathway pasien rawat inap mutu asuhan keperawatan

References

  1. Bosse G, Ngoli B, Leshabari MT, Kulker R, Dammrich T, Abels W, et al. Quality of health care and the need for assessment. East Afr J Public Health. 2011;8(3):199-204.
  2. Mosadeghrad AM. Healthcare service quality: towards a broad definition. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2013;26(3):203-219.
  3. World Health Organization. Delivering Quality Health Services A Global Imperative for Universal Health Coverage. Switzerland: WHO Publication. 2018;1-93
  4. Arcaya MC, Arcaya AL, Subramanian SV. Inequalities in health: definitions, concepts, and theories. Glob Health Action. 2015;8:27106.
  5. Cheah J. Development and implementation of a clinical pathway programme in an acute care general hospital in Singapore. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000;12(5):403-412.
  6. Hipp R, Abel E, Weber RJ. A Primer on Clinical Pathways. Hosp Pharm. 2016;51(5):416-421. doi:10.1310/hpj5105-416
  7. Cheah TS. Clinical pathways--the new paradigm in healthcare?. Med J Malaysia. 1998;53(1):87-96.
  8. Asmirajanti M, Syuhaimie Hamid AY, Hariyati TS. Clinical care pathway strenghens interprofessional collaboration and quality of health service: a literature review. Enferm Clin. 2018;28 Suppl 1:240-244.
  9. Komite Medik RSUP Sanglah. Panduan Integrated Clinical Pathway. Denpasar. 2017
  10. Direktur Utama RSUP Sanglah. Surat Keputusan Direktur Utama RSUP Sanglah Denpasar tentang Lima Area klinis Prioritas. Denpasar. 2018
  11. Komite Medik RSUP Sanglah. Laporan Pemantauan Clinical Pathway Komite Medik RSUP Sanglah. Denpasar. 2018
  12. Bao H, Yang F, Su S, Wang X, Zhang M, Xiao Y, et al. Evaluating the effect of clinical care pathways on quality of cancer care: analysis of breast, colon and rectal cancer pathways. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016;142(5):1079-1089.
  13. Lawal AK, Rotter T, Kinsman L, Machotta A, Ronellenfitsch U, Scott DS, et al. What is a clinical pathway? Refinement of an operational definition to identify clinical pathway studies for a Cochrane systematic review. BMC Med. 2016;14:35.
  14. Maryam Y, Sima R, Omid K, Elmira M, Mina J, Samaneh S, et al. A systematic review of factors influencing healthcare services marketing in Iran. Bali Medical Journal. 2017;6(2):268-278
  15. Tim Pokja SDKI DPP PPNI. Standar Diagnosis Keperawatan Indonesia. 1 ed. Jakarta: Dewan Pengurus Pusat Persatuan Perawat Nasional Indonesia. 2017.
  16. Moorhead S. Johnson M, Maas M, Swanson E. Nursing Outcomes Classification. Edisi Kelima. Disunting oleh I. Nurjannah dan R. De. Tumanggor. CV. Mokomedia. 2016:1-776
  17. Jabbour M, Newton AS, Johnson D, Curran JA. Defining barriers and enablers for clinical pathway implementation in complex clinical settings. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):139.
  18. Bulechek GM, McCloskey JC. Nursing interventions classification (NIC). Medinfo. 1995;8 Pt 2:1368.

How to Cite

Artana, I. M., Indrayathi, P. A., & Wirawan, I. M. A. (2020). Penilaian mutu asuhan keperawatan sebelum dan sesudah penerapan clinical pathway di Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat (RSUP) Sanglah, Bali, Indonesia. Intisari Sains Medis, 11(2), 528–534. https://doi.org/10.15562/ism.v11i2.655
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

HTML
320

Total
305

Share

Search Panel

I Made Artana
Google Scholar
Pubmed
ISM Journal

Putu Ayu Indrayathi
Google Scholar
Pubmed
ISM Journal

I Made Ady Wirawan
Google Scholar
Pubmed
ISM Journal