Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer


Background: Numerous data records that the number of total hip joint replacement is increasing in many parts of the world which also indicates an increase demand for total hip joint replacement and revision surgery. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature regarding the size of femoral head and its relation to the volumetric wear rate of the polyethylene lining of the hip’s acetabular component.

Methods: A systematic literature search performed to identify relevant publications for this review in five databases: University of Melbourne Science, Medline/ Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Ebsco. The search was completed on 6 October 2012 and again on 24 October 2012. The following keywords and phrases were used: total hip joint replacement, femoral head size, wear, polyethylene and arthroplasty.

Results: The six studies are all prospective cohort studies with a follow-up time ranging between three to ten years at the minimum. One study conducted by Hammerberg et al. did not mention the minimum length of their follow up however they include a mean follow up period which is 3.6 years. Two studies did not mention the number of patients they are following up. Every other studies mention how many participants included in their study, but these two studies mention how many hips undergo the total hip joint replacement surgery. The number of patients mentioned in the studies vary from the minimum of 42 patients up until 200 patients. The number of hips in each study ranged from 45 hips to 385 hips.

Conclusion: This review concludes that the use of larger femoral head size hastens the wear rate of the polyethylene lining of the acetabulum component.


  1. Rothwell A TJ, Wright M, Devane P, Tobin H, Griffin H, Henwood A, Miles K, Hobbs T, . The New Zealand Joint Registry- Twelve Year Report. 2011. Epub October 2011.
  2. Beaumont R TJ, Wright M, Young E. NJR Annual Report 2011. 2011.
  3. Davidson D GS, Tomkins A, Ryan P, Griffith L, Cashman K, Liu Y L, Stanford T. Hip and Knee Arthrosplasty Annual Report. 2012.
  4. Garrelick G KJ, Rogmark C, Herberts P. Swedish Hip Arthrosplasty Register. 2010. Epub 1 October 2011.
  5. Gopinath S CD, Guia N. Canadian Joint Replacement Registry. 2001.
  6. Hip Joint- Relevant Anatomy. 28 May 2009; Available from:
  7. Williams MH, Newton JN, Frankel SJ, Braddon F, Barclay E, Gray JA. Prevalence of total hip replacement: how much demand has been met? Journal of epidemiology and community health. 1994;48(2):188-91. Epub 1994/04/01.
  8. Lachiewicz PF, Heckman DS, Soileau ES, Mangla J, Martell JM. Femoral head size and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene at 5 to 8 years. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2009;467(12):3290-6. Epub 2009/08/20.
  9. Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Morrey B. Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 1990;72(4):518-28. Epub 1990/04/01.
  10. Geller JA, Malchau H, Bragdon C, Greene M, Harris WH, Freiberg AA. Large diameter femoral heads on highly cross-linked polyethylene: minimum 3-year results. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2006;447:53-9. Epub 2006/06/03.
  11. Bragdon CR, Kwon YM, Geller JA, Greene ME, Freiberg AA, Harris WH, et al. Minimum 6-year followup of highly cross-linked polyethylene in THA. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2007;465:122-7. Epub 2007/12/20.
  12. Muratoglu OK, Bragdon CR, O'Connor D, Perinchief RS, Estok DM, 2nd, Jasty M, et al. Larger diameter femoral heads used in conjunction with a highly cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene: a new concept. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2001;16(8 Suppl 1):24-30. Epub 2001/12/14.
  13. Sayeed SA, Mont MA, Costa CR, Johnson AJ, Naziri Q, Bonutti PM, et al. Early outcomes of sequentially cross-linked thin polyethylene liners with large diameter femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty. Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases. 2011;69 Suppl 1:S90-4. Epub 2011/11/09.
  14. Kluess D, Martin H, Mittelmeier W, Schmitz KP, Bader R. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement. Medical engineering & physics. 2007;29(4):465-71. Epub 2006/08/12.
  15. C SW. Total Hip Replacement. 2012 [updated 11 November 2012; cited 2012 12 November]; Available from:
  16. Catherine Logan M. The Hip Joint: IDEA Fitness Journal; 2005.
  17. 32 ed: Saunders Elsevier; 2011. Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary, 32nd Edition.
  18. R C. Polyethylene and Polyethylene Wear. 2012 [updated 15 May 2012]; Available from:
  19. Moher LA, Tetzlaff J, Altman D G. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Medicine. July 2009.
  20. Hammerberg EM, Wan Z, Dastane M, Dorr LD. Wear and range of motion of different femoral head sizes. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2010;25(6):839-43. Epub 2009/09/25.
  21. Shaju KA, Hasan ST, D'Souza LG, McMahon B, Masterson EL. The 22-mm vs the 32-mm femoral head in cemented primary hip arthroplasty long-term clinical and radiological follow-up study. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2005;20(7):903-8. Epub 2005/10/19.
  22. Ketut Kris Adi; KAWIYANA, I Ketut Siki. Management of acute ankle sprain: A literature review. Indonesia Journal of Biomedical Science, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 2, p. 20-26, dec. 2016. ISSN 2302-2906. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 19 Feb. 2019. doi:

How to Cite

Ruslie, J. R. (2019). The effect of femoral head size on volumetric wear rate following total hip joint replacement surgery. Intisari Sains Medis, 10(2).




Search Panel

Jason Rahmadi Ruslie
Google Scholar
ISM Journal