Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Abstract

Background: Some studies reported that measuring serum creatine kinase (CK) level is an objective method with which to determine the relative invasiveness of surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the change in post-operative serum CK levels as a measure of whether the direct anterior approach (DAA) is less invasive than the posterior approach (PA) regarding postoperative rehabilitation.

Methods: This study design was a descriptive research with a qualitative approach, systematic literature review study. ResearchGate, Google Scholar and ScienceDirect searches reviewed changes in serum creatine kinase in patients after total hip arthroplasty. A total of 5 studies conducted between 2019-2023 were included in this review to present a literature review regarding changes in serum creatine kinase in patients after total hip arthroplasty.

Results: We analyzed biochemical markers of muscle damage in patients treated with total hip arthroplasty with minimally invasive and standard posterolateral approach to providing objective evidence of the local soft-tissue injury at the time of arthroplasty. A total of 42,890 titles were identified and 5 studies that met the requirements/criteria which discussed changes in serum creatine kinase in patients after total hip arthroplasty.

Conclusion: The objective measurement of muscle damage markers provides an unbiased way of determining the immediate effects of surgical intervention in patients treated with total hip arthroplasty.

References

  1. De Berardinis L, Senarighi M, Farinelli L, et al. In primary total hip arthroplasty, the direct anterior approach leads to higher levels of creatine kinase and lower levels of C-reactive protein compared to the posterolateral approach: a propensity score matching analysis of short-term follow-up data. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):594.
  2. Ramadanov N, Marinova-Kichikova P, Hable R, Dimitrov D, Becker R. Comparison of Postoperative Serum Biomarkers after Total Hip Arthroplasty through Minimally Invasive versus Conventional Approaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Prosthesis. 2023; 5(3):694-710.
  3. Meng W, Gao L, Huang Z, et al. Supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPath) versus mini-incision posterolateral total hip arthroplasty for hip osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(5):392.
  4. Skrzep-Poloczek B, Poloczek J, Chełmecka E, et al. General, 21-day postoperative rehabilitation program has beneficial effect on oxidative stress markers in patients after total hip or knee replacement. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020;2020:4598437.
  5. Tonotsuka H, Sugiyama H, Tanaka D, Ito T, Amagami A, Marumo K. Postoperative creatine kinase elevation following hip arthroscopy and associated risk factors. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019;53(6):397-401.
  6. Rouzrokh P, Mickley JP, Khosravi B, et al. THA-AID: deep learning tool for total hip arthroplasty automatic implant detection with uncertainty and outlier quantification. J Arthroplasty. Published online September 26, 2023.
  7. Dundon JM, Felberbaum DL, Long WJ. Femoral stem size mismatch in women undergoing total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop. 2018;15(2):293-296.
  8. Astawa P. Hemodynamic changes in patients undergoing cemented total hip replacement surgery: A literature review. Bali Medical Journal. 2020;9(2):520-523.
  9. Scott CEH, Clement ND, Davis ET, Haddad FS. Modern total hip arthroplasty: peak of perfection or room for improvement?. Bone Joint J. 2022;104-B(2):189-192.
  10. Moerenhout K, Derome P, Laflamme GY, Leduc S, Gaspard HS, Benoit B. Direct anterior versus posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a multicentre, prospective, randomized clinical trial. Can J Surg. 2020;63(5):E412-E417.
  11. Rahma AI, Awalia A. Perioperative management of patient with late rheumatoid arthritis and post-bone tuberculosis with genu contracture undergoing tenotomy. Bali Medical Journal. 2022; 11(2): 913-917.
  12. Putera AD, Hasan M, Riyadli M, Fakhry MN. Determinants of patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA): a literature review. Bali Medical Journal. 2023;12(2):1813-1820.
  13. Wedari NLPH, Budayanti NNS, Sukrama IDM, Mayura IPB. Implementation of antinuclear antibodies in autoimmune diagnostic tests: a literature review from immunological aspects. Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2022;2(2):27-30.
  14. Kayani B, Konan S, Chandramohan R, Haddad FS. The direct superior approach in total hip arthroplasty. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2019;80(6):320-324.
  15. Flevas DA, Tsantes AG, Mavrogenis AF. Direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty revisited. JBJS Rev. 2020;8(4):e0144.
  16. Sarantis MG, Mandrekas PI, Stasi S, et al. Serum biomarkers for the assessment of muscle damage in various surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of comparative studies. Int Orthop. 2022;46(8):1681-1692.

How to Cite

Dewabratha, B. (2023). Changes in creatine kinase serum in patient after total hip arthroplasty. Intisari Sains Medis, 14(3), 1222–1226. https://doi.org/10.15562/ism.v14i3.1921

HTML
0

Total
0

Share

Search Panel

Bhisma Dewabratha
Google Scholar
Pubmed
ISM Journal