Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Hubungan kadar Laju Endap Darah (LED) dan C-Reactive Protein (CRP) sebagai nilai prediktor dalam diagnosis osteomielitis dengan infeksi kaki pasien Diabetes Mellitus Tipe-2 (DM2) di RSUP DR. Wahidin Sudirohusodo, Makassar, Indonesia

Abstract

Background: Diabetes Mellitus Type-2 (DM2) is a disease that can cause various complications, one of the common complications is diabetic foot, especially in osteomyelitis patients. Several parameters are known to contribute to the occurrence of diabetic foot such as ESR and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). This study aims to evaluate the relationship between ESR and CRP levels as a predictor value in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis with foot infection in DM2 patients.

Methods: This study is a diagnostic study with cross-sectional data collection techniques on 67 patient medical records from the Department of Surgery, Dr. RSUP. Wahidin Sudirohusodho consecutively during the period from June to October 2020. The variables assessed in this study included age, gender, Body Mass Index (BMI), comorbidities, duration of diabetes, HbA1c, ESR, C-Reactive Protein (CRP), and osteomyelitis. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 20 for Windows.

Results: There was a significant difference in ESR levels (96.00 (79.00-115.00) vs. 67.50 (22.00-88.00 mm/hour; p=0.000), procalcitonin (16.04 (0.05) -42.03 vs. 30.17 (0.21-56.08) ng/mL; p=0.003), and female gender (72.00% vs. 28.00%; p=0.022) in both the osteomyelitis group and non-osteomyelitis. From the ROC curve analysis, the parameters with significant results were ESR (Cut-Off: 83.75 mm/hour; p=0.000) and procalcitonin (Cut-Off: 19.72 ng/mL; p=0.003) in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in DM2 patients.

Conclusion: There is a significant difference in terms of ESR values ​​and procalcitonin levels between the group of T2DM patients with osteomyelitis and without osteomyelitis. Of the three inflammatory marker parameters, namely CRP, ESR and procalcitonin, the ESR value is known to have the highest accuracy as a predictor of osteomyelitis.

 

Latar Belakang: Diabetes Mellitus Tipe-2 (DM2) merupakan penyakit yang dapat menimbulkan berbagai macam komplikasi, salah satu komplikasi yang umum terjadi adalah kaki diabetes khususnya pada pasien osteomielitis. Beberapa parameter diketahui berkontribusi terhadap terjadinya kaki diabetes seperti Laju Endap Darah (LED) maupun C-Reactive Protein (CRP). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi hubungan kadar LED dan CRP sebagai nilai prediktor dalam diagnosis osteomielitis dengan infeksi kaki pasien DM2

Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian diagnostik dengan teknik pengambilan data potong lintang terhadap 67 rekam medis pasien dari Departemen Ilmu Bedah RSUP Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodho secara konsekutif selama periode Juni hingga Oktober 2020. Variabel yang dinilai pada penelitian ini meliputi usia, jenis kelamin, Indeks Massa Tubuh (IMT), komorbiditas, durasi menderita diabetes, HbA1c, Laju Endap Darah (LED), C-Reaktif Protein (CRP), dan osteomielitis. Data dianalisis dengan SPSS versi 20 untuk Windows.

Hasil: Terdapat perbedaan bermakna kadar LED (96,00 (79,00-115,00) vs 67,50 (22,00-88,00 mm/jam; p=0,000), prokalsitonin (16,04 (0,05-42,03 vs 30,17 (0,21-56,08) ng/mL; p=0,003), dan jenis kelamin perempuan (72,00% vs 28,00%; p=0,022) baik pada kelompok osteomielitis dan non-osteomielitis. Dari hasil analisis kurva ROC didapatkan parameter dengan hasil bermakna adalah LED (Cut-Off: 83,75 mm/jam; p=0,000) dan prokalsitonin (Cut-Off: 19,72 ng/mL; p=0,003) dalam penegakakan diagnosis osteomielitis pada pasien DM2.

Kesimpulan: Terdapat perbedaan yang bermakna dari segi nilai LED dan kadar prokalsitonin antara kelompok pasien DMT2 dengan osteomielitis dan tanpa osteomielitis. Dari ketiga parameter penanda inflamasi yakni CRP, LED dan prokalsitonin, nilai LED diketahui memiliki akurasi paling tinggi sebagai prediktor terjaidnya osteomielitis

References

  1. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9thedition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157:107843.
  2. Mulyani WRW, Sanjiwani MID, Sandra, Prabawa IPY, Lestari AAW, Wihandani DM, et al. Chaperone-Based Therapeutic Target Innovation: Heat Shock Protein 70 (HSP70) for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020;13:559-568.
  3. Khan Y, Khan MM, Farooqui MR. Diabetic foot ulcers: a review of current management. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2017;5(11):4683-4689.
  4. Zubair, M. Diabetic Foot Ulcer: A Review. American Journal of Internal Medicine. 2015;3(2):28-49.
  5. Bader MS. Diabetic foot infection. Am Fam Physician. 2008;78(1):71-79.
  6. Guarner J, Dolan HK, Cole L. Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate: Journey Verifying a New Method for an Imperfect Test. Am J Clin Pathol. 2015;144(4):536-538.
  7. Sproston NR, Ashworth JJ. Role of C-Reactive Protein at Sites of Inflammation and Infection. Front Immunol. 2018;9:754.
  8. Hadavand F, Amouzegar A, Amid H. Pro-Calcitonin, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C - reactive Protein in Predicting Diabetic Foot Ulcer Characteristics; a Cross Sectional Study. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2019;7(1):37.
  9. Fleischer AE, Didyk AA, Woods JB, Burns SE, Wrobel JS, Armstrong DG. Combined clinical and laboratory testing improves diagnostic accuracy for osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2009;48(1):39-46.
  10. Butalia S, Palda VA, Sargeant RJ, Detsky AS, Mourad O. Does this patient with diabetes have osteomyelitis of the lower extremity?. JAMA. 2008;299(7):806-813.
  11. Van Asten SA, Nichols A, La Fontaine J, Bhavan K, Peters EJ, Lavery LA. The value of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Int Wound J. 2017;14(1):40-45.
  12. Soleimani Z, Amighi F, Vakili Z, Momen-Heravi M, Moravveji SA. Diagnostic value of procalcitonin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), quantitative C-reactive protein (CRP) and clinical findings associated with osteomyelitis in patients with diabetic foot. Hum Antibodies. 2021;29(2):115-121.
  13. Moallemi SK, Niroomand M, Tadayon N, Forouzanfar MM, Fatemi A. Diagnostic Value of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C Reactive Protein in detecting Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis; a Cross-sectional Study. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020;8(1):e71.
  14. Basuki I, Kusuma MI, Suprapto B, Hendarto J. C-reactive protein levels as a predictor for anastomotic success in post-operative intestinal resection surgery. Bali Medical Journal. 2020;9(2):511-515.
  15. Kalma. Studi Kadar C-Reactive Protein (CRP) pada Penderita Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2. Jurnal Medika Analis Kesehatan. 2018;1(1):62-68.
  16. Jonaidi Jafari N, Safaee Firouzabadi M, Izadi M, Safaee Firouzabadi MS, Saburi A. Can procalcitonin be an accurate diagnostic marker for the classification of diabetic foot ulcers?. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2014;12(1):e13376.
  17. Umapathy D, Dornadula S, Rajagopalan A, Murthy N, Mariappanadar V, Kesavan R, et al. Potential of circulatory procalcitonin as a biomarker reflecting inflammation among South Indian diabetic foot ulcers. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(4):1283-1291.
  18. Zakariah NA, Bajuri MY, Hassan R, Ismail Z, Md Mansor M, Othman H, et al. Is Procalcitonin more superior to hs-CRP in the diagnosis of infection in diabetic foot ulcer? Malays J Pathol. 2020;42(1):77-84.
  19. Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Wunderlich RP, Mohler MJ, Wendel CS, Lipsky BA. Risk factors for foot infections in individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(6):1288-1293.
  20. Michail M, Jude E, Liaskos C, Karamagiolis S, Makrilakis K, Dimitroulis D, et al. The performance of serum inflammatory markers for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with osteomyelitis. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2013;12(2):94-99.
  21. Al-Shammaree SAW, Abu-ALkaseem BA, Salman IN. Procalcitonin levels and other biochemical parameters in patients with or without diabetic foot complications. J Res Med Sci. 2017;22:95.
  22. Sharma H, Sharma S, Krishnan A, Yuan D, Vangaveti VN, Malabu UH, et al. The efficacy of inflammatory markers in diagnosing infected diabetic foot ulcers and diabetic foot osteomyelitis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2022;17(4):e0267412.
  23. Dharma BDA, Mulyantari NK, Prabawa IPY. Analisis korelasi kadar serum prokalsitonin dengan jumlah leukosit pada penderita dengan kecurigaan sepsis di RSUP Sanglah, Bali, Indonesia. Intisari Sains Medis. 2020;11(1):179-182.
  24. El-Kafrawy NA, Shaaban MA, Korany MA, Sonbol AA, Ata MB. Procalcitonin as a marker of diabetic foot ulcer infection. Egypt J Intern Med. 2019;31(4):652–657.

How to Cite

Mulawardi, Jancung, Mustari, M. N., & Hendarto, J. (2022). Hubungan kadar Laju Endap Darah (LED) dan C-Reactive Protein (CRP) sebagai nilai prediktor dalam diagnosis osteomielitis dengan infeksi kaki pasien Diabetes Mellitus Tipe-2 (DM2) di RSUP DR. Wahidin Sudirohusodo, Makassar, Indonesia. Intisari Sains Medis, 13(2), 493–499. https://doi.org/10.15562/ism.v13i2.1433

HTML
0

Total
0

Share